Talk:Builder pattern: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:43, 3 June 2019

Revision as of 18:40, 11 May 2020

Line 6:

A major benefit of builders is that they can be used to create immutable objects without complex constructors. In Java, the builder pattern also simulates named constructor parameters:

<sourcesyntaxhighlight lang="java">

public final class Pizza {

private final String dough;

Line 52:

}

}

</syntaxhighlight>

</source>

==Abstract Builder class==

Line 156:

== C# implementation ==

In keeping with C# style, shouldn't properties be used instead of java-like setters?

<sourcesyntaxhighlight lang = "csharp">

public string Dough {

get {return _dough;}

Line 165:

}

...

</syntaxhighlight>

</source>

== Critics ==

Line 197:

disappears:

<sourcesyntaxhighlight lang="python">

class Pizza:

def __init__(self,dough='Hand Tossed', sauce='Marinara', topping='Cheese'):

Line 206:

# Use the standard dough

p = Pizza(sauce='Garlic Butter', topping='Pepperoni')

</syntaxhighlight>

</source>

...But then, the "Definition" section of the article says this: