Content deleted Content added
→Issues with the two new sections.: replying |
|||
Line 29:
* [[WP:NPOV]]: The section as if there were no other algorithm for the same problem, or as if these algorithms are variants of the Brooks–Iyengar algorithm. This is unbelievable in such an important area.
* Suspected [[WP:COPYVIO]]: The text seems to be copied-pasted from a text written elsewhere. A witness of this is the use of "Figure [3]" and "[17]" in a context where these numbers are nonsensical.
* Suspected [[WP:COI]]: The use of first names only for denoting some contributors "Pablo and Gabriel" suggests a strong connection with the editor.
As each of these issues is a valid reason for a revert, I'll revert these sections. [[User:D.Lazard|D.Lazard]] ([[User talk:D.Lazard|talk]]) 14:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
:{{u|Lateshkj}}, please respond to these concerns instead of re-adding the removed information. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 13:55, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
* [[WP:NOTESSAY]]: The impact of the algorithm is on its way in Chpater Book, Since algorithm is described in here, the influence and its impact needs to be addressed.
* [[WP:SYNTHESIS]]: Yes, It is true, the algorithm is used as training material at universities, and in RT MINIX, hence the word stands its meaning.
* [[WP:Reliable sources]]: A Journal on this algorithm is under review
* [[WP:NPOV]]: Every research has its own impact and weight, we are focusing on our algorithm at the same time we have mutual respect other algorithms too.
[[WP:COPYVIO]]: The images are created for the journal papers (under review).. the same images were used, we will certainly update image titles
[[WP:COI]]: These two authors have adopted the Algorithm and enhanced it by adding additional features.
Let us know
| |||