Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Kerrexus - "→Licence modification: new section" |
Hadihariri (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 52:
As standard library is integral part of the language, I believe the license part could be expanded a little. Since I'm not sure how to do it properly, here's the link for anyone interested:
https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin/tree/master/license <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kerrexus|Kerrexus]] ([[User talk:Kerrexus#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kerrexus|contribs]]) 13:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Inaccuracy with recent simplification of Kotlin page ==
A recent edit with the purpose of simplifying the language, leads to an inaccurate representation of facts. While JetBrains and Google have created the Kotlin Foundation, as outlined on the Kotlin Foundation site, Kotlin is not primarily sponsored by JetBrains and Google. Kotlin is primarily sponsored and developed by JetBrains, as indicated clearly on the Kotlin Web Site. My changes to clarify this have been reverted. Initially I've been accused of being a paid editor. Then I've been accused of being a professional marketer. And also been told that I have a conflict of interest because while I am not a paid editor, I work for the company. I disclose this in my edit. The fact that I work for the company should not get in the way of facts or inaccuracies. The fact that JetBrains developers Kotlin and the Kotlin team are employed by JetBrains should not be viewed as promotional. I request that the changes I made which accurately reflect the facts as shown on the above cited sites, be re-instated.[[User:Hadihariri|Hadihariri]] ([[User talk:Hadihariri|talk]]) 19:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
| |||