Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:44, 11 June 2019

Revision as of 14:45, 11 June 2019

Line 21:

*******Any source including the [http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html team] is [[WP:PS]]. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 04:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

******** In the beginning, I listed enough resources that establish notability through reliable and secondary resources (printed journals, reviewed articles and companies using the language). You are talking about another topics (popularity & developer feedback). for popularity I listed many resources about the language like thousands of movies and blogs by many authors, and for developers feedback. You can add this section (Criticism) to the article using neutral point of view. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 10:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

*********Referring to your original list at 16:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC): #1 is [[WP:PS]]; Hany Salah is [http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html Marketing]. #3 Gold Magic 800 isn't notable. #5 is [[WP:PS]]; Majdi Sobain is a [http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html Senior Tester]. #6 is unfavourable towards all of those languages; moreso towards Ring. #7 says ''"Ring itself is an unpopular language that does not offer much for non-programmers. It might be hard to get a community started in this. However if the overall Emotiq projects draws enough attention, this could snowball into Emotiq making Ring well known along with it — exactly what happened with Ruby and Rails."''; which is [[WP:TOOSOON]] since they immediately recommend Emotiq make their own DSL instead in the following paragraph. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 14:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC)