Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 22:
******** In the beginning, I listed enough resources that establish notability through reliable and secondary resources (printed journals, reviewed articles and companies using the language). You are talking about another topics (popularity & developer feedback). for popularity I listed many resources about the language like thousands of movies and blogs by many authors, and for developers feedback. You can add this section (Criticism) to the article using neutral point of view. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 10:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
**Referring to your original list at 16:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC): #1 is [[WP:PS]]; Hany Salah is [http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html Marketing]. #3 Gold Magic 800 isn't notable. #5 is [[WP:PS]]; Majdi Sobain is a [http://ring-lang.sourceforge.net/team.html Senior Tester]. #6 is unfavourable towards all of those languages; moreso towards Ring. #7 says ''"Ring itself is an unpopular language that does not offer much for non-programmers. It might be hard to get a community started in this. However if the overall Emotiq projects draws enough attention, this could snowball into Emotiq making Ring well known along with it — exactly what happened with Ruby and Rails."''; which is [[WP:TOOSOON]] since they immediately recommend Emotiq make their own DSL instead in the following paragraph. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 14:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
*** These are enough [https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/11/23/%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A1-%D8%AA%D8%B7%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%AA%D9%82%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%86-%D9%83%D9%88%D8%AF/2979508 1] [https://store.steampowered.com/app/939200/Gold_Magic_800/ 2] [https://www.codeproject.com/Tips/1222859/Different-styles-for-writing-Hello-World-program-i 3] [https://www.ciklum.com/blog/new-programming-languages-a-hype-or-reality/ 4] and the authors are not listed in Ring Team, Also listing [http://ring-lang.net 180 members in Ring Team] doesn't change their secondary resources about the language to primary resources, because it's clear that [http://ring-lang.net/doc/index.html Ring 1.0 is developed and published by Fayed alone in 2016] then their names are added after they provided what we can consider as secondary resources (articles, applications, etc) as we notice from the Role column in [http://ring-lang.net/team.html Ring Team] and [https://github.com/ring-lang/ring/graphs/contributors GitHub contributors]. so other references [https://www.youm7.com/story/2016/1/11/%D9%81%D9%89-25-%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%84-%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A9-%D8%AC%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%86/2532713#.Vxg2-tQrLIU 1] [https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1096942/Squares-Puzzle-using-RingAllegro 2] are secondary references too, all of this establish notability while being listed in top 100 programming languages by [https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ TIOBE Index] and it was in [https://glinksolutions.vn/2018/06/28/evolution-ring-programming-language/ top 50 in 2018] indicates popularity which is good too. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 15:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||