Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 37:
*The newly created ''Popularity'' section shouldn't mention TIOBE, since Wikipedia is a dependency; the Ring marketing team is good at SEO optimisation, but not anything else really. The rest isn't [[WP:NEUTRAL]]! [https://medium.com/@cryptovision/blockchain-app-development-outlook-will-we-all-write-apps-in-the-future-fe5704247b4e Medium] says "Ring itself is an ''unpopular'' language that does not offer much for non-programmers.". [https://www.ciklum.com/blog/new-programming-languages-a-hype-or-reality/ Ciklum] says "many developers perceive Ring as being too similar to other programming languages already in existence; in other words, it ''doesn’t offer anything innovative''.". This language may be [[WP:N]] for being the most ambitious job exploitation (I'm aware of), but the article should reflect the below average quality of the language. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 03:03, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Temporal Interval
! Download Quantity
|-
| [https://sourceforge.net/projects/ring-lang/files/stats/map?dates=2016-01-25+to+2017-01-25 2016-01-25+to+2017-01-25]
| 17,688
|-
| [https://sourceforge.net/projects/ring-lang/files/stats/map?dates=2017-01-25+to+2018-01-25 2017-01-25+to+2018-01-25]
| 13,443
|-
| [https://sourceforge.net/projects/ring-lang/files/stats/map?dates=2018-01-25+to+2019-01-25 2018-01-25+to+2019-01-25]
| 8,885
|-
| [https://sourceforge.net/projects/ring-lang/files/stats/map?dates=2019-01-25+to+2019-06-11 2019-01-25+to+2019-06-11]*
| 2,662
|}
* This is sufficient evidence of a declining popularity; there's probably a lot of Egyptian click bait for this language. -- [[User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated]] ([[User talk:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated|talk]]) 04:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
| |||