Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Request sources - three best sources - not more |
||
Line 328:
*'''Delete''' It feels like there are editors of the Ring article doing whatever they can to make Ring appear significant, and the burden is on the readers to sort it all out. [[User:Dgpop|Dgpop]] ([[User talk:Dgpop|talk]]) 19:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
** I understand your feelings, but in Wikipedia we follow guidelines, the topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article. Maybe it's the language barriers because some of these resources are written in Arabic.[[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 02:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
*** The main issue here is, your walls of text don´t demonstrate notability, quite the opposite (ref bombing). If you could select only 3 best sources (not more!!!), so we can review them, that would certainly help. [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 05:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
| |||