Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ring (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Wak sources leaning to delete |
||
Line 332:
***** No. Please select only 3 best sources about Ring. Thanks. [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 07:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
****** I did, references from the same publisher are counted as (one reference), So I picked only 3 references for PWCT and the same for Ring, and together they are the article topic (Ring and related projects (Supernova, PWCT)). The references that I picked are enough for notability, and we have more references in the table above (if we need). Thank you very much [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 07:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
******* Your five refs about Ring: Code Project accepts user submited content - not a RS; general reliability of youm7 was disputed above by Colin M and I share his feeling; BIMArabia seems to publish anything you throw at them, but I can´t base my judgement on Google translate. Certainly not stellar sourcing in your selection. I´m leaning to delete. [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 08:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
| |||