Revision as of 16:13, 9 July 2019 edit Matthiaspaul (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 137,876 edits +c ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:26, 9 July 2019 edit undo Mark viking (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 19,327 edits →Tea (programming language): this wasn't Charmk's doing Next edit →
Line 12: * Suggesting ''speedy keep'' per [[User:Stifle]] at [[User talk:Charmk#User warning: Disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point]]. To properly determine the value and notability of these programming languages, we need experts in the specific application fields as well as language design and history. However, the many nominations of the same type at present do not allow careful research in the given time, so it's better to keep a weak article than to accidently lose a notable one just because someone was [[WP:POINTY]]. : --[[User:Matthiaspaul\|Matthiaspaul]] ([[User talk:Matthiaspaul\|talk]]) 16:12, 9 July 2019 (UTC) :: To be fair to Charmk, they did not nominate this article; indeed they recommended keep with sources above. --<code>{{u\|[[User:Mark viking\|Mark viking]]}} {[[User talk:Mark viking\|Talk]]}</code> 17:25, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tea (programming language): Difference between revisions