Revision as of 19:36, 9 September 2019 edit Nullzero (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 568 edits →Idempotent or injective? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:19, 27 November 2019 edit undo Ybungalobill (talk \| contribs) 211 edits →Coding Styles section mostly detracts Next edit →
Line 127: Languages that only feature one coding style should be removed from this section (or have another coding style added), as they have nothing to compare/contrast and therefore only confuse and detract from the actually beneficial sections. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.141.80.20\|64.141.80.20]] ([[User talk:64.141.80.20#top\|talk]]) 05:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> : Agree. This section should be cleaned-up. No point in listing non-functional languages. Sure, any imperative language can have `fib(n) = fib(n-1) + fib(n-2)` defined, but that's not the point, or else this list will grow indefinitely. [[User:Ybungalobill\|bungalo]] ([[User talk:Ybungalobill\|talk]]) 22:19, 27 November 2019 (UTC) == Would anyone mind if I add an example for R? ==

Talk:Functional programming: Difference between revisions