Content deleted Content added
→Response and criticism: This was a terribly written and confusing sentence. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
This statement is patently false. All these names are FOR the article, not against it. Tag: references removed |
||
Line 39:
==Response and criticism==
[[Joseph L. Graves]] and Amanda Johnson argued that the statements in ''Mainstream Science in Intelligence'' revealed either ignorance or bias on the part of the signatories.
In a posthumous article in 1996, [[Donald T. Campbell]], a former president of the [[American Psychological Association]], included his own analysis of the ''Wall Street Journal'' statement, previously drafted as a letter to that newspaper.<ref name="Laosa 1996">{{harvnb|Laosa|1996}}</ref><ref name="Campbell 1996">{{harvnb|Campbell|1996}}</ref> Campbell first remarked that:
| |||