Talk:Factor (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:21, 5 December 2006

Revision as of 19:22, 5 December 2006

Line 4:

[[User:Ceran|Ceran]] 18:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Aside from answering the eternal question "What would Lisp look like backwards?", no, this language isn't very notable. That said, the previous commenter makes a good point in that there are articles on far less note-worthy topics. More importantly (and surprisingly), it still appears to be under active development. As of today, the author is making regular updates to his blog at http://factor-language.blogspot.com/. So who knows, maybe this boring love-child of Lisp and Forth might actually become useful.

== So what is the point of this yet another programming language ? ==

The article is weak about the originality of this language, it says it's postfixed ? so what there are zillions languages like that and [[Forth]] is among the most commons ? is this just yet another vanity language ? what does it brings to the art of language programming design ? --[[User:Khalid hassani|Khalid hassani]] 19:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)