Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates/Fish and karate/Questions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Question from Gerda: reply to Gerda |
→Question from Peacemaker67: reply to Peacemaker67 |
||
Line 30:
#{{ACE Question
|Q=What do you think about the decision to accept [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort]]? In particular, considering the lack of prior dispute resolution attempts or attempt to use ANI to deal with the behavioural issues. Why or why not?
|A=There were prior dispute resolution attempts and it was clear those that were tried were very unsuccessful, to the point it was clear simply kicking the can back to ANI would likely not be able to address such a complex set of issues. There's little point in requiring such a complex and sensitive conduct issue - which this clearly was - to go through dispute resolution steps just for the sake of ticking boxes, when it would inevitably end up being bounced back to Arbcom a few weeks later. Furthermore, in this case there was the additional factor of non-public information pertinent to the case (including private correspondence and a clean-start account), which would not have been manageable at ANI.}}
===Question from Gerda===
|