Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates/Fish and karate/Questions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
+1 |
||
Line 54:
|Q=If the answer to the above is no, how would you have voted on certain remedies that split the current committee? Feel free to pick your own remedies; otherwise you can also choose from these: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fram#Removal_of_sysop_user-rights], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama#Rama_desysopped], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German_war_effort#Auntieruth55_reminded]. (Feel free to answer this question as well even if the answer to the above is "yes", although it likely won't be necessary.)
|A=}}
===Question from Cassianto===
#{{ACE Question
|Q=Last year, I was the named party in the ham-fisted [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions]], that was brought about as a result of a biased committee not being impartial. The case should've been entitled Infobox 3, but the committee considered it to be too difficult to deal with the infobox problem and instead, made the case exclusively about me - suffice to say, the problem with infobox discussions still exist. I wondered whether, in future cases, not exclusive to IB discussions, you would consider it more important to deal with the cause rather than just a symptom?
|A=
}}
| |||