Aid Worker Security Database: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Declining submission: {{subst:Talkspin}} Discuss at Talk:Attacks on humanitarian workers. Spinning out an article should reflect a rough... and mergeto - Submission should be merged into an existing article (AFCH 0.9.1)
Line 1:
{{AFC submission|d|reason|<!-- Template:Talkspin -->
{{AFC submission|d|web|u=HumOutcomes|ns=118|demo=|decliner=Worldbruce|declinets=20191023000651|ts=20190627181826}} <!-- Do not remove this line! -->
This draft is a request to [[WP:SPINOUT|spin out]] an article, a form of [[WP:SPLIT|splitting]]. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article.
 
This does not mean that the draft should be spun out, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun out. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article, it may be Rejected or [[WP:MFD|nominated for deletion]].) Discuss at [[Talk:Attacks on humanitarian workers]]. Spinning out an article should reflect a rough consensus at the parent article talk page.
 
|u=HumOutcomes|ns=118|decliner=Robert McClenon|declinets=20200117064746|reason2=mergeto|details2=Attacks on humanitarian workers|ts=20191205150112}} <!-- Do not remove this line! -->
{{AFC submission|d|web|u=HumOutcomes|ns=118|demo=|decliner=Worldbruce|declinets=20191023000651|small=yes|ts=20190627181826}} <!-- Do not remove this line! -->
 
{{AFC comment|1=The subject-specific guideline that applies is [[WP:NWEB]]. The draft's lead says that according to ''The New York Times'', the database "is widely regarded as an authoritative reference for aid organisations and governments in assessing trends in security threats." Reliable sources frequently cite the database in its subject area, so I think the ''NYT'' is right. But my reading of [[WP:WEBCRIT]] is that web notability is not demonstrated by the database being cited frequently (unlike the guidelines for [[WP:PROF|academics]] and for [[WP:NMEDIA|newspapers, magazines, and academic journals]]). Instead, the database itself needs to be the subject of multiple, independent, non-trivial works.
Line 77 ⟶ 83:
* ''Aid in Danger: The Perils and Promise of Humanitarianism;'' Fast, Larissa<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=W9w8AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA309&dq=Aid+Worker+Security+Database#v=onepage&q=Aid%20Worker%20Security%20Database&f=false|title=Aid in Danger: The Perils and Promise of Humanitarianism|last=Fast|first=Larissa|date=2014-05-14|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|isbn=9780812246032}}</ref>
* ''Ghosts of Afghanistan: The Haunted Battleground;'' Steele, Jonathan<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/?id=zva1izlghPAC&pg=PT383&dq=Aid+Worker+Security+Database#v=onepage&q=Aid%20Worker%20Security%20Database&f=false|title=Ghosts of Afghanistan: The Haunted Battleground|last=Steele|first=Jonathan|date=2011-10-01|publisher=Catapult|isbn=9781582438405}}</ref>
* "Neglect and Failures of Human Security in Humanitarian Settings: Challenges and Recommendations" Macpherson, Robert; Burkle, Frederick M<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Macpherson|first=Robert|last2=Burkle|first2=Frederick M.|date=April 2013|title=Neglect and Failures of Human Security in Humanitarian Settings: Challenges and Recommendations|journal=Prehospital and Disaster Medicine|volume=28|issue=2|pages=174–178|doi=10.1017/S1049023X13000022|pmid=23351996|issn=1049-023X}}</ref>
 
==References==
Line 86 ⟶ 92:
* [https://aidworkersecurity.org/ Official website]
* [https://www.humanitarianoutcomes.org/ Humanitarian Outcomes website]
 
{{AFC submission|||ts=20191205150112|u=HumOutcomes|ns=118}}