Revision as of 07:00, 10 December 2019 edit 2a02:a455:1903:1:c4d6:4de4:7855:38b5 (talk) →Reverted note. It's useful but misplaced. It should be in one of the articles that includes that chart. Individual characters aren't footnoted and if they were, there would be hundreds of footnotes in the charts. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:01, 10 December 2019 edit undo 2a02:a455:1903:1:c4d6:4de4:7855:38b5 (talk) →Reverted note. It's useful but misplaced. It should be in one of the articles that includes that chart. Individual characters aren't footnoted and if they were, there would be hundreds of footnotes in the charts. Next edit →
Line 28: Your assertion that the statement that HWHF is meaningless in Unicode is inappropriate is false. The character is obviously meaningless in a Unicode context and if you're too dumb to see why just check the reference provided. And given that it is, that's an exceptional property for a character and it should be noted. So... 1) Why must the present notes be on the character code templates and why can't they be in the relevant articles? 2) Why is the solution to make (some) notes in the character code template appear only in its main article unacceptable?

Template talk:Unicode chart Halfwidth and Fullwidth Forms: Difference between revisions