Revision as of 07:01, 10 December 2019 edit 2a02:a455:1903:1:c4d6:4de4:7855:38b5 (talk) →Reverted note. It's useful but misplaced. It should be in one of the articles that includes that chart. Individual characters aren't footnoted and if they were, there would be hundreds of footnotes in the charts. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:06, 10 December 2019 edit undo 2a02:a455:1903:1:c4d6:4de4:7855:38b5 (talk) →Reverted note. It's useful but misplaced. It should be in one of the articles that includes that chart. Individual characters aren't footnoted and if they were, there would be hundreds of footnotes in the charts. Next edit →
Line 33: 3) Would turning the HWHF table cell into a hyperlink that leads to an explanation be acceptable? 4) Why is neither of you replying productively? Why are you just concerned with removing important information and not thinking about actual solutions?

Template talk:Unicode chart Halfwidth and Fullwidth Forms: Difference between revisions