Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 953:
:Interestingly, [[WP:MOSBIO]] doesn't seem to come close to giving guidance, which is a pity. But I have no doubt that it's in keeping with the spirit of the rest of the guidance to keep names unadorned and exclude the "reverend", so thanks v much for correcting it. --[[User:BrownHairedGirl|BrownHairedGirl]] <sup>[[User_talk:BrownHairedGirl|(talk)]] • ([[Special:Contributions/BrownHairedGirl|contribs]])</sup> 18:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
:: After saying not to include honorifics in front of names it does give some exceptions: ''"Note that in the case of some historic people, an honorific is so commonly attached to their names that it should be included. Thus, in the U.S. in the 1930s, "Father Coughlin" (Charles Coughlin). Likewise, include the honorific for Father Damien, ...."'' By giving these specific exceptions surely the norm must be not to use such religious forms or why mention them as exceptions. I could raise it at MoS talk to get a specific mention in the MoS but i've not seen rev included enough in articles to worry. :) [[User:Alci12|Alci12]] 18:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
| |||