Rotating-wave approximation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Derivation: In the current version, H0 used in "Derivation" section does not match exactly with the H0 given in "Mathematical formulation" section. However, the difference does not have an effect on the relevant physics. Inserted a sentence with two different justifications for this difference.
Line 78:
: <math>U = e^{iH_0t/\hbar} = e^{i \omega_0 t |\text{e}\rangle \langle\text{e}|} = |\text{g}\rangle \langle\text{g}| +e^{i \omega_0 t} |\text{e}\rangle \langle\text{e}|</math>,
 
where the last step can be seen to follow e.g. from a [[Taylor series]] expansion with the fact that <math>|\text{g}\rangle\langle\text{g}|+|\text{e}\rangle\langle\text{e}|=1</math>, and due to the orthogonality of the states <math>|\text{g}\rangle</math> and <math>|\text{e}\rangle</math>. weThe substitution for <math>H_0</math> in the second step being different from the definition given in the previous section can be justified either by shifting the overall energy levels such that <math>|\text{g}\rangle</math> has energy <math>0</math> and <math>|\text{e}\rangle</math> has energy <math>\hbar \omega_0</math>, or by noting that a multiplication by an overall phase (<math>e^{i \omega_0 t/2}</math> in this case) on a unitary operator does not affect the underlying physics. We now have
 
: <math>\begin{align}