Talk:Semi-implicit Euler method: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 43:
 
Agreed. I was surprised to see this labeled as "semi-implicit" Euler. Under that name I would have expected something like the Crank-Nicolson method. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.163.53.10|24.163.53.10]] ([[User talk:24.163.53.10|talk]]) 01:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
This name is vague to me, since I've seen semi-implicit Euler to mean many things. Some people call any IMEX semi-implicit Euler, e.g. This is the first time I've seen it used for symplectic Euler. I don't know if the best way to address this is to create multiple sections for the different meanings. [[User:Fish sounds|Fish sounds]] ([[User talk:Fish sounds|talk]]) 02:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 
== Arguments of ''f'' and ''g'' ==