Revision as of 14:02, 23 May 2003 edit Mintguy (talk \| contribs) 11,899 edits mNo edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:11, 23 May 2003 edit undo TakuyaMurata (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers 92,676 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 4: If you want a separate article called [[object theory]] that explains differnet methods of using objects in programming languages then fine. But the aspects of the OO paradigm discussed in this article (abstraction, encapsulation, polymorphism and inheritance) is a vast subject that deserves a least a whole page devoted to it. What you have us call it? OOP is the universally understood term used for these concepts. [[User:Mintguy\|Mintguy]] 14:01 23 May 2003 (UTC) :Please don't use the current content as an excuse. I want to rename first because otherwise, people will claim it is not OOP. Certainly we want to discuss what is OOP? But the more important is, history of OOP, point of views, variants, and so on. They are certainly beyond an article named object-oriented programming. Again, oftentimes, broader term serves well in encyclopedia. I showed an example above. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata\|Taku]] 15:11 23 May 2003 (UTC)

Talk:Object-oriented programming: Difference between revisions