Talk:Comparison of functional programming languages: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:00, 11 May 2020

Revision as of 23:45, 27 December 2020

Line 36:

Actually, same with the abstract data types column, since every modern language (functional or not) now comes first-class record types. (PS Same person as above) --[[Special:Contributions/212.252.177.149|212.252.177.149]] ([[User talk:212.252.177.149|talk]]) 07:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

:I agree with you about closures. I don't think it would count as a functional language if it didn't have closures (or lambdas)! However, Abstract Data Types doesn't have all "Yes"s in its column, so that would have to be dealt with. Although it seems very ill-defined to me. Type Classes are usually how that's implemented aren't they? But then RankNTypes can be used too I think—does that count? What about Row Polymorphism / Extensible Records? Perhaps it'd be better to have separate columns for those specific features. --[[User:RProgrammer|RProgrammer]] ([[User talk:RProgrammer|talk]]) 23:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC)