Revision as of 15:22, 19 May 2020 edit 80.47.47.163 (talk) →Compared to rotation matrices: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:23, 19 May 2020 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,756 edits m Signing comment by 80.47.47.163 - "→Compared to rotation matrices: new section" Next edit →
Line 918: "Compared to rotation matrices they are more compact, more numerically stable, and more efficient" However, quaternion rotation requires 24 add/mul operations but a 3x3 matrix requires only 15 add/mul operations. Also, the "more numerically stable" claim is unjustified and I cannot find a reference. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.47.47.163\|80.47.47.163]] ([[User talk:80.47.47.163#top\|talk]]) 15:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Talk:Quaternions and spatial rotation: Difference between revisions