|
JAMMNO GIBS BUTTSECKS.
Hi!
Does anybody know if there is a feature comparison between different wiki softwares? - [[de:Benutzer:SoniC|SoniC]]
== CGI ==
The article says wiki engines are usually implemented as a CGI script. Am I right to doubt about this? I guess the Perl wikis were dominating once, but what now with PHP...and Wikimedia?--[[User:Chealer|Chealer]] 06:33, 2004 Nov 17 (UTC)
== Text Wiki ==
Would this help in being able to convert from one wiki to another (e.g., PHPwiki to Mediawiki)? [[User:Brettz9|[[User:Brettz9|Brettz9]] [[User talk:Brettz9|(talk)]]]] 02:19, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
:Would what help?--[[User:Chealer|Chealer]] 06:18, 2004 Nov 17 (UTC)
== Huge list of engines considered harmful ==
Should we do away with, or at least prune heavily, the list of engines in this article?
* [[Wiki:WikiEngines]] describes itself as "the canonical list of WikiEngines", whereas this list is doomed to being incomplete; that page also links to other resources on the topic.
* It's currently badly layed out (what kind of a sub-heading is "Microsoft"?)
* We have rather inconsistent information ("CitiWiki [8] (http://wiki.cs.cityu.edu.hk/citiwiki) has been called the "Wiki of the next generation"."; by whom, and meaning what exactly?)
* All the engines are <nowiki>[[linked]]</nowiki>, but most of them are probably non-encyclopedic, meriting a mention on this page ''at the very most''.
* As already mentioned, [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not|Wikipedia is not]] a [[web directory]].
Perhaps we should just limit ourselves to a list of "popular or noteworthy wiki engines", and be quite harsh in our judgement of people declaring their own wikis "noteworthy". If not, someone needs to go through this list and make it a whole lot more consistent and, well, useful. - [[User:IMSoP|IMSoP]] 16:38, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
:We should keep, at the minimum, the ones which we have articles on. [[User:Angela|Angela]][[user talk:Angela|.]] 20:24, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)
::Well, perhaps that should be "at minimum, the ones we ''should'' have articles on": there may well be worthy articles as yet unwritten ([[FlexWiki]], for instance, is arguably notable as being an [[open source]] project developed by [[Microsoft]]), and currently-existent articles on non-notable engines (possible examples: [[CitiWiki]], [[OpenWiki]]). Hence the criterion of "noteworthy": if it's worthy of an article, it's worthy of a place on this list. On the other hand, it may not be worthy of a whole article to itself, but be worth mentioning here in summary. - [[User:IMSoP|IMSoP]] 18:01, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
:Don't see the harm - there's also a fairly large list of [[Blog| Blog engines]], for instance (IMO, not even large enough). It will help people find the software that most fits their needs. - [[User:JavaWoman|JavaWoman]] 10:57, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
| 