Revision as of 22:11, 1 June 2020 edit Dawnseeker2000 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 535,883 edits m Alter: isbn, pages. Add: chapter-url, series. Removed or converted URL. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were actually parameter name changes. \| You can use this tool yourself. Report bugs here. \| via #UCB_Gadget ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:21, 1 June 2020 edit undo Dawnseeker2000 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 535,883 edits date formats per MOS:DATEFORMAT by script, add nav template Next edit →
Line 1: {{Use dmy dates\|date=~~May~~June ~~2011~~2020}}▼ {{Infobox software \| screenshot = Compendium.v1.5.2-Screenshot.png Line 22 ⟶ 23: The software can be used by a group of people in a collaborative manner to convey ideas to each other using visual diagrams. A group [[Facilitation (business)\|facilitation]] method called [[dialogue mapping]] is especially suited for use with Compendium.<ref>{{harvnb\|Conklin\|2006}}; {{harvnb\|Zubizarreta\|2006}}</ref> Compendium templates for critical thinking can be used to create [[argument map]]s using the [[argumentation scheme]]s developed by [[argumentation theory]] scholars such as [[Douglas N. Walton]], Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno.<ref>As described in {{harvnb\|Walton\|Reed\|Macagno\|2008}}; to download the templates, see: {{cite web \|title=Argumentation schemes: compendium templates for critical thinking \|website=compendium.open.ac.uk \|url=http://compendium.open.ac.uk/openuniversity/compendium-arg-schemes.html \|accessdate=~~2018-08-~~17 August 2018}}</ref> Argumentation schemes are pre-defined patterns of reasoning for analysing and constructing arguments; each scheme is accompanied by a list of critical questions that can be used to evaluate whether a particular argument is good or [[fallacious]]. By using these argumentation schemes, users of Compendium can examine claims in more detail to uncover their implicit logical substructure and improve the rigor and depth of discussions.<ref>{{harvnb\|Buckingham Shum\|2007}}</ref> == Features == Line 78 ⟶ 79: *{{cite web \|title=Relevant online content \|publisher=CogNexus Institute links to places where issue mapping, dialogue mapping, IBIS, Compendium, wicked problems and many other related topics are discussed online \|date=2014 \|url=http://www.cognexus.org/relevant_online_content.htm \|accessdate=11 January 2015 \|ref=harv}} {{Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software}} ▲{{Use dmy dates\|date=May 2011}} {{Mindmaps}}

Compendium (software): Difference between revisions