Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) |
Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 460:
: Huaiwei is under probation as a result of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Instantnood 3]]. It looks like this can be handled by filing a complaint at [[WP:AE|Arbitration enforcement]] rather than opening a new case. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 20:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
==== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/
* '''Reject''' - take it to arbitration enforcement, as I believe that should be sufficient. Questions of appropriate style are outside the arbitration committee's remit and should be settled in the normal way - by talking and reaching a rough consensus. [[User:Morven|Matthew Brown (Morven)]] ([[User talk:Morven|T]]:[[Special:Contributions/Morven|C]]) 23:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 466:
* Reject. What he said. [[User:Charles Matthews|Charles Matthews]] 22:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
* Reject, per Morven. [[User:Jdforrester|James F.]] [[User talk:Jdforrester|(talk)]] 23:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
* Reject [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 15:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
----
| |||