Content deleted Content added
→DDR(X) SDRAM, Connectors' numbers of Pins??: Asked and answered. Perhaps should be linked to more clearly from the article I was asking about? |
→Proposed merge & split: Support |
||
Line 200:
Yes, it makes sense to split the material specific to the original "SDRAM" generation, as opposed to information common to the entire family of standards, to {{no redirect|SDR SDRAM}}, and then merge [[PC66]], [[PC100]], and [[PC133]] into the newly split {{no redirect|SDR SDRAM}}. – [[User:Wbm1058|wbm1058]] ([[User talk:Wbm1058|talk]]) 20:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
* '''Support''' --[[User:Zac67|Zac67]] ([[User talk:Zac67|talk]]) 20:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
::{{ping|Wbm1058}} that looks fine to me too. I had a look at doing this myself, but had trouble separating the SDR-SDRAM from the SDRAM material; I wonder if you, or someone closer to this field than me, might given it a go. [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 20:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
== DDR(X) SDRAM, Connectors' numbers of Pins?? ==
| |||