Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Java version history: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Keep without a major rewrite, but with more independent sources. |
→Java version history: keep |
||
Line 18:
*'''Keep, support rewrite''': Per [[User:Hervegirod|Hervegirod]] and [[User:Shushugah|Shushugah]]. The article is in definitive need of a rewrite, but I think the Java verson history is notable enough to have it's own article. Granted, it does go into over detail and sounds like an advertisement at some parts, but the article is salvageable enough to be fixed. [[User:SuperGoose007|<span style="color:red">Super</span><span style="color:purple">Goose</span><span style="color:orange">007</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:SuperGoose007|(<span style="color=blue">Honk!</span>)]]</sup> 02:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
*'''Keep without a major rewrite, but with more independent sources.''' The only significant issue with this page is with [[WP:NOTCHANGELOG]] (point 4), which states that reliable third-party sources should be used. The information itself should be kept on Wikipedia, perhaps with some minor trimming if it is deemed excessive (as also mentioned in point 4). [[User:Modernponderer|Modernponderer]] ([[User talk:Modernponderer|talk]]) 12:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as per Modernponderer. More 3rd party sources should be used, and the level of detail trimmed a bit, but this is verifiable, useful, and notable. No reason to delete it. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 17:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
| |||