Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Java version history: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
sources? |
→Java version history: reply to BenKuykendall |
||
Line 20:
*'''Keep''' as per Modernponderer. More 3rd party sources should be used, and the level of detail trimmed a bit, but this is verifiable, useful, and notable. No reason to delete it. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 17:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' {{re|SuperGoose007|Modernponderer|DESiegel}} did you have any particular sources in mind? We need actual (reliable independent) sources to argue notability. [[User:BenKuykendall|BenKuykendall]] ([[User talk:BenKuykendall|talk]]) 04:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
:*I don't know, {{U|BenKuykendall}}, I haven't looked. but for a a language as widely used and written about as Java, I would be utterly astounded if at least the major versions were not well described in reliable 3rd party sources. Texts on the language seem like a good starting place, I know there are many of those. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 15:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
| |||