IMS Learning Design: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:08, 8 July 2020

Revision as of 13:51, 18 November 2020

Line 25:

==Implementation – Players ==

* The Open University of the Netherlands had developed an IMS LD engine for playing LD called CopperCore.<ref>[http://www.coppercore.org/]</ref>. The project was abandoned since 2008.

* The University Carlos III of Madrid<ref>[http://www.uc3m.es]</ref> had developed an IMS LD player into the .LRN<ref>[http://dotlrn.org]</ref> Learning platform. It is the first player that has been built completely embedded into an LMS. This player is open source and available from CVS.<ref> [http://cvs.openacs.org]</ref>. The project was abandoned.

== Implementation – authoring and export ==

Line 34:

* OpenGLM is an extension of Graphical Learning Modeller, enabling users to retrieve, publish and share resources and learning designs in an open repository ([http://sourceforge.net/projects/openglm/ Download link]).

* [[LAMS]] (Learning Activity Management System):<ref>[http://lamsfoundation.org]</ref> [[LAMS]] used to export learning designs in IMS Learning Design Level C format, but this was dropped in version 2.5.

* [[Moodle]] had planned to changed its current course export format to follow the IMS Learning Design specification in Moodle v2.0 according to the Moodle roadmap.<ref>https://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=3758</ref>. However, this feature never come into fruition.

== References ==