Revision as of 22:10, 1 August 2020 edit Bluerasberry (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 57,521 edits →Unsubstantiated statements: no references here - remove template... Tag: Manual revert ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:11, 1 August 2020 edit undo Bluerasberry (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 57,521 edits just a shortcut... Next edit →
Line 282: I plan to rewrite this paragraph and will refer to the reference that is already there. While I am sure the intent is good, it seems to be based on opinions rather than verifiable facts. "Which style to use in teaching reading has divided educators for years. It is now known that using the two approaches together is more powerful than either program alone.<nowiki><ref name="Rayner, 2001"/></nowiki> The technical skills learned through phonics are important for many children when learning to read, spell, and general language comprehension and engagement of children in the whole-language approach is also important to keep the children motivated and excited to learn. Many teachers and schools acknowledge this and say that they use multiple methods to teach children to read." [[User:Jnhmunro\|John]] ([[User talk:Jnhmunro\|talk]]) 20:11, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Learning to read: Difference between revisions