Content deleted Content added
→The Soviet tank -relevance dispute: saveing |
m →The Soviet tank -relevance dispute: spacing |
||
Line 79:
::::::::::::Sory, I can't understand you. Are you saying that this monument is not representative because it is unique?
I added two pictures: One with the statue of Lenin in front of the Government building and one with the soviet tank monument. You removed the latter and replaced the first with one in which the statue of Lenin can't be seen(even though it is at monuments chapter). Maybe you don't want them because you think they link Transnistrian regime with communism ideology. Personaly I would like a third oppinion or mediation. Which one do you find suitable?[[User:Dl.goe|Dl.goe]] 08:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
I don't really know where to place my comments, so I guess I'll add them here. I think all pictures being disputed are relevant to the article and could be included. I like the Parliament picture from farther away more. The one from close gives too small a frame around the building (not even all is seen), and then the wires are in the way. I don't know, I guess it's just a matter of aesthetic preference. Nevertheless, I think the picture with the tank should stay up. Not necessarily because the tank is of great importance, but it is symbolic of much of the Soviet imagery that punctuates the city and which is a major motif of Tiraspol. [[User:TSO1D|TSO1D]] 00:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
| |||