Talk:Reticulated python: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Contradictions: new section
Line 541:
 
so I removed that language in the bit where it says a 130 pound reticulated python couldn't swallow a normal human. In a lot of its territory, it sure could. citation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_body_weight <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.22.38.204|24.22.38.204]] ([[User talk:24.22.38.204#top|talk]]) 14:05, 2 June 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Contradictions ==
 
The introduction states "It is among the three heaviest snakes. Like all pythons, it is a non-venomous constrictor. Adult humans have been claimed to have been killed (and in at least two reported cases, eaten) by reticulated pythons.[6][7][8] '''However, this is false as their mouths cannot stretch to a human's width'''."
 
Then, there is a whole "Danger to humans" section that is not aligned.
 
This should be corrected, but I am not in the position to do so.