Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2009/March: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:32, 13 October 2020

Revision as of 22:51, 26 February 2021

Line 526:

:I've generally used US-gov-bio-stub for employees and US-poli-bio-stub for those who have failed to win an election, who is it that you are looking at using this one on. [[User:Waacstats|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats|talk]]) 20:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

::BTW - the name of your new stub template - {{tl|Usagov}} - isn't really acceptable on a number of levels (see [[WP:WSS/NG]]) - and why it's linked to {{cl|Writer stubs}} is a bit of a mystery! [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''<small><font color="#008822">[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?]]</font></small>'' 21:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

I have? Well it wasn't intentional ;S In this case it was <nowiki>{{V. Larry Teaver, Jr.}}</nowiki> - I'm not sure if he could be classed as a politician due to my lack of knowledge of American politics, but I hope you get where I'm coming from. I called it that as a base until we'd come to a consensus as to whether this could work out - I wouldn't leave it like that. [[User:TheUnfortunate|TheUnfortunate]] ([[User talk:TheUnfortunate|talk]]) 23:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

:'''Oppose''' as these are already covered by the poli and gov bios.--[[User:Thomas.macmillan|TM]] 23:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>