Content deleted Content added
rv and protect for the time being, to have a track record
sysop status revoked; page protected
Line 46:
----
Eloquence: I confirm this - I do not think any had the quality of vandlism, otherwise I would have stepped in. We were concerned that a "handbook type" with direct instructions to certain practises on certain pages was endangering the reputation of wikipeia and of us as visible contributers and cooperators. A first thing many teachers and professors for example do, before they endorse or use a web based project in class or with students/parents, is to search for ugly content within. And there was some, and as we were supported by responses of colleagues with the right background it was beyond the rules of wikipedia - young vikings are often of very spontaneous mannors, I advised them to do things different, but then we are also very democratic. they plan to do it different now - we could have done everything anonymous, but we did not - from that you can deduct that we all are interested in communication and construction - we are all astonished how much time you spent in the wikipedia project (Anerkennung!) you seem to need only very little sleep - best greetings across the ocean (from the USA) from uwe kils - user [[User:Kils|Kils]] 18:50 31 May 2003 (UTC)
 
-----
 
Uwe, I have temporarily revoked your sysop status, see my post to the wikien-l mailing list [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2003-May/003920.html] and feel free to respond there. It is my understanding that you do not want this discussion to be visible, I will therefore unprotect this page as soon as this matter is settled so you can revert to a prior revision. In the meantime, I want to allow others to view your response. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 19:11 31 May 2003 (UTC)