Help talk:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→"The Michigan Daily" example - "letter to the editor" by an author without established reliability?: Re Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
|||
Line 118:
: "Not reliable. Forbes, a well-known American business magazine, might seem at first glance like a reliable source. And indeed, content written by Forbes staffers is considered generally reliable. However, this article was not written by a Forbes staffer, but rather by an unaffiliated contributor. Such articles have little editorial oversight and are considered generally unreliable."
Similarly, the letter to the editor was written by an unaffiliated contributor. That makes me think the answer to the Michigan Daily should be "not reliable". [[User:Ikjbagl|Ikjbagl]] ([[User talk:Ikjbagl|talk]]) 15:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
:{{Re|Ikjbagl}} Oh oops, I missed the letter to the editor designation. Yeah, we should probably find some other college fact to use as an example there. Any thoughts on what the best general-interest college fun fact might be? <span style="color:#AAA"><small>{{u|</small><span style="border-radius:9em;padding:0 5px;background:#088">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF">'''Sdkb'''</span>]]</span><small>}}</small></span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 15:59, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
| |||