Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2011/May: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
|||
Line 10:
{{sfp create|rename and slap pegship with a trout :P }}
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2010/December#Category:Oregon_organization_stubs Back in December] this cat was created, along with a correctly formed {{tl|Oregon-org-stub}} template; I can only speculate that someone was hitting the egg nog when naming the category. '''Rename''' to {{cl|Oregon organization stubs}}. [[User:Pegship|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 00:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:Usually handled through SFD< but with such an obvious one I don't see any reason why it shouldn't bee speedied....hey....Pegship! Welcome back! [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small
::Oops. Been too long; I forgot the procedure. Good to see you too, G. :P [[User:Pegship|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 03:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
:Welcome back Pegship, nice to see you again. I'm sure this was suggested here and it was mentioned that the category should be at organization so '''support'''
Line 70:
I am proposing a speedy creation stub (if that's how you phrase it) for Australian ports, docks and marinas. It fits because it is nationwide and... yeah, see S2.
This stub can fit under so many like [[Akuna Bay, New South Wales]], http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundaberg_Port, rowra Waters, New South Wales]], [[Challenger Harbour]], http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fremantle_Fishing_Boat_Harbour, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillarys_Boat_Harbour, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Bay,_New_South_Wales, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Rocks,_Western_Australia and most of them under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ports_in_Australia. Please create.
:'''Oppose'''. This isn't a speedy, because there aren't 60 stubs for it. There aren't 60 articles in the parent permcat - for the very good reason that there ''is no permcat'' (which makes the creation of a stub type questionable in itself). In any case, the articles are almost certainly better sorted by their respective geo types, especially since several of the ones you list cover not only the ports themselves but the towns or suburbs which surround them. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small
{{sfp bottom}}
Line 109:
==={{tl|Monument-stub}}?===
{{sfp top|no consensus, not created}}
While it is true that {{cl|Sculpture stubs}} doesn't yet need splitting (and has quite a number of sculpt''or'' articles in it which shouldn't be there, I think a separate stub for monuments and memorials would be useful and would almost certainly get to the threshold for a separate category ({{cl|Monument and memorial stubs}}). A quick coulty shows that over 450 of the current sculpture stubs have either the word "monument" or "memorial" as part of their name, and it's likely that many others in the category would qualify for this proposed stub type. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small
*I'm not 100% convinced by the template name, the reason being that in the Netherlands the equivalent of a graded property or NRHP is called a reiksmonument often shortened to monument so things could get confusing. I dont think {{tl|memorial-stub}} would be much better either and putting both in there would be unecessarily large template name. [[User:Waacstats|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats|talk]]) 09:21, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
:What about creating a stub tag for the latter titled {{tl|Rijksmonument-stub}}? (Apologies if I've got the spelling wrong). I think a monument stub tag would be a great help, yes. --<font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Ser Amantio di Nicolao]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|''Che dicono a Signa?'']]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ser Amantio di Nicolao|'''Lo dicono a Signa.''']]</sub> 13:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
::I was just pointing out that linking monuments to sculptures would be problematic. A {{tl|Reiksmonument-stub}} would be the dutch equivalent of {{tl|NRHP-stub}}, may be a {{tl|Sculpture-monument-stub}} would be better.[[User:Waacstats|Waacstats]] ([[User talk:Waacstats|talk]]) 23:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
:::Given the name of the opermcat, perhaps two separate templates: {{tl|Sculpture-monument-stub}} and {{tl|Memorial-stub}}? [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small
{{sfp bottom}}
Line 227:
*{{tl|Japan-restaurant-stub}}
A generic {{tl|Europe-restaurant-stub}} might be useful as well, since there are a large number of countries in Europe with three or four stubs. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small
*'''Support''' all. --<font face="Old English Text MT">[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Ser Amantio di Nicolao]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|''Che dicono a Signa?'']]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ser Amantio di Nicolao|'''Lo dicono a Signa.''']]</sub> 15:49, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
{{sfp bottom}}
Line 438:
:[[User:Dawynn|Dawynn]] ([[User talk:Dawynn|talk]]) 13:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
::Only just found this - thanks to it being put at the wrong place on the page. Given that the punk one is at punkmusic-stub, the others should follow suit, surely - at rockmusic-stub, grungemusic-stub, etc... eithe that or the punk one need renaming that to {{tl|punk-music-stub}} (probably a better idea). Will suggest it at SFD. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small
{{sfp bottom}}
| |||