Linear probability model: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
m Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 4 templates: del empty params (2×); hyphenate params (3×);
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Line 8:
:<math> E[Y|X] = \Pr(Y=1|X) =x'\beta,</math>
and hence the vector of parameters β can be estimated using [[least squares]]. This method of fitting would be inefficient,<ref name=Cox /> and can be improved by adopting an iterative scheme based on [[weighted least squares]],<ref name=Cox/> in which the model from the previous iteration is used to supply estimates of the conditional variances, <math>\operatorname{Var}(Y|X=x)</math>, which would vary between observations. This approach can be related to fitting the model by [[maximum likelihood]].<ref name=Cox/>
 
Horace and Oaxaca (2006) shows that estimating such a model using OLS leads to biased and inconsistent parameter estimates. THey propsed a trimmed 2SLS estimation technique to correct the effects.
 
A drawback of this model is that, unless restrictions are placed on <math> \beta </math>, the estimated coefficients can imply probabilities outside the [[unit interval]] <math> [0,1] </math>. For this reason, models such as the [[logit model]] or the [[probit model]] are more commonly used.