Revision as of 17:39, 30 December 2020 edit Gustav Addnode (talk \| contribs) 50 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:09, 1 January 2021 edit undo Wham2001 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Temporary account IP viewers 44,868 edits →Addnode Group: Follow-up Next edit →
Line 35: :– If not on its own, maybe together with the other referenced news sources (computer sweden and DI). [[User:Gustav Addnode\|Gustav Addnode]] ([[User talk:Gustav Addnode\|talk]]) 17:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC) ::The DI and Computer Sweden sources are recycled press releases - they're of no value for establishing notability and shouldn't be used unattributed in the article. I agree with Blablubbs about Aktiesparma - it's a routine listing. I don't know anything about Avanza but on the face of it the source appears to be an investment guide produced by the publishing arm of an investment management company. So far, AFAICT, there are two usable sources (Avanza and SvD), both of them investment guides. I wouldn't consider that enough to meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Wham2001\|Wham2001]] ([[User talk:Wham2001\|talk]]) 10:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addnode Group: Difference between revisions