Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Request Move / Re-org: new section |
||
Line 18:
The "Film and video high-CRI LED lighting incompatibility" section describes the applicability of CRI scores to film and video results. Still digital photography is not specifically mentioned. Could such material be added? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dmk5717|Dmk5717]] ([[User talk:Dmk5717#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dmk5717|contribs]]) 17:52, 3 June 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Request Move / Re-org ==
Hi all. Like the above very old merge request mentions. There are numerous reasons why this page needs extensive editing.
1) The topic of "Color Rendering" in color science / lighting science has come to mean much much more than the CIE CRI standard.
2) The CIE no longer endorses the use of CRI although has not replaced it. In 2015 they endorsed the IES TM-30 standard
3) Many of the "alternatives" are not really contenders in the lighting community. SSI, TLCI, and TM-30 are pretty much the only 3 new standards that matter to a wide audience at this point.
Therefore I think a page specifically called "Color Rendering" should be created which just defines the topic provides a paragraph overview of the most important standards and links to their pages. Important specific pages would, at the very least include "CRI, TLCI, TM-30", and "SSI".
I am happy to work on these articles but I'm a new wikipedian, I don't know the best ways to go about this.
Lastly, since part of what I am discussing doesn't have a clear place for content like the CQS paragraphs, I would move these to the "Color Rendering" topic page in some kind of "other alternatives" just so that interested readers could know that they are out there and have some search terms for them. I'm not willing, at this time, to cover those in depth.
[[User:TDcolor|TDcolor]] ([[User talk:TDcolor|talk]]) 19:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
| |||