Revision as of 18:14, 4 December 2020 edit GSS (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 69,624 edits rm self-promotion ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:41, 22 January 2021 edit undo Monkbot (talk \| contribs) Bots 3,695,952 edits m Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 49 templates: hyphenate params (1×); Tag: AWB Next edit →
Line 349: Some researchers have made a functional and experimental analysis of several distributed file systems including HDFS, Ceph, Gluster, Lustre and old (1.6.x) version of MooseFS, although this document is from 2013 and a lot of information are outdated (e.g. MooseFS had no HA for Metadata Server at that time).<ref>{{cite web\|last1=Séguin\|first1=Cyril\|last2=Depardon\|first2=Benjamin\|last3=Le Mahec\|first3=Gaël\|title=Analysis of Six Distributed File Systems\|url=https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/789086/filename/a_survey_of_dfs.pdf\|website=HAL}}</ref> The cloud based remote distributed storage from major vendors have different APIs and different consistency models.<ref>{{cite web\|title=Data Consistency Models of Public Cloud Storage Services: Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage and Windows Azure Storage\|url=https://www.systutorials.com/3551/data-consistency-models-of-public-cloud-storage-services-amazon-s3-google-cloud-storage-and-windows-azure-storage/\|website=SysTutorials\|~~accessdate~~access-date=19 June 2017}}</ref> ==See also==

Comparison of distributed file systems: Difference between revisions