Low-level programming language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m I included a few examples for the low level Programming languages ☺️
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Noaht2 (talk | contribs)
m Improve formatting
Line 9:
Low-level languages can convert to machine code without a compiler or interpreter – [[second-generation programming language]]s use a simpler processor called an [[Assembly language#Assemble|assembler]] – and the resulting code runs directly on the processor. A program written in a low-level language can be made to run very quickly, with a small [[memory footprint]]. An equivalent program in a [[high-level language]] can be less efficient and use more memory. Low-level languages are simple, but considered difficult to use, due to numerous technical details that the programmer must remember. By comparison, a [[high-level programming language]] isolates execution semantics of a computer architecture from the specification of the program, which simplifies development.
 
Some examples of Lowlow-Levellevel Programmingprogramming Languageslanguages are [[C]], [[C++]] , FORTRAN[[Fortran]] , [[COBOL]] &and x86[[assembly Assemblylanguage]].
 
==Machine code==