Revision as of 20:56, 5 February 2021 edit RokerHRO (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 553 edits →Get rid of Overloadable column for those all-yes ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:56, 5 February 2021 edit undo RokerHRO (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 553 edits m →Get rid of Overloadable column for those all-yes Next edit →
Line 290: ::..So, it's okay to remove the column, right? And for "included in C"? ᛭ [[User:LokiClock\|LokiClock]] ([[User talk:LokiClock\|talk]]) 03:59, 15 May 2010 (UTC) ::: Even after 10 years, I'd favour to remove redundant "all yes" columns and replace them by a small text between sub-heading and table, as suggested by User:LokiClock. --[[User:RokerHRO\|RokerHRO]] ([[User talk:RokerHRO\|talk]]) 20:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC) == Overload prototypes ==

Talk:Operators in C and C++: Difference between revisions