Talk:Cantor's first set theory article: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:41, 14 January 2021

Revision as of 21:39, 10 February 2021

Line 1:

{{Talk header}}

{{GA|22:25, 17 August 2018 (UTC)|topic=Mathematics|page=2|oldid=855385322}}

{{articleArticle history

{{Maths rating|class=GA|importance=low|field=foundations|historical=yes}}

{{article history

|action1=GAN

|action1date=23:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

|action1link=Talk:Georg Cantor's first set theory article/GA1

|action1result=failed

|action2=GAN

|action2date=22:25, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

|action2link=Talk:Georg Cantor's first set theory article/GA2

|action2result=listed

|action2oldid=855385322

|dykdate=7 December 2018

{{DYK talk|7 December|2018|entrydykentry= ... that mathematicians disagree about whether a proof in [[Georg Cantor]]'s '''[[Georg Cantor's first set theory article|first set theory article]]''' actually shows how to construct a [[transcendental number]], or merely proves that such numbers exist?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/Georg Cantor's first set theory article}}

|dyknom=Template:Did you know nominations/Georg Cantor's first set theory article

|currentstatus=GA

|topic=Mathematics

}}

{{Maths rating|class=GA|importance=low|field=foundations|historical=yes}}

{{archives}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talkarchive}}

Line 17 ⟶ 29:

|archive = Talk:Cantor's first set theory article/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{DYK talk|7 December|2018|entry= ... that mathematicians disagree about whether a proof in [[Georg Cantor]]'s '''[[Georg Cantor's first set theory article|first set theory article]]''' actually shows how to construct a [[transcendental number]], or merely proves that such numbers exist?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/Georg Cantor's first set theory article}}

== No need to merge article with Cantor's first uncountability proof -- already contains its content ==