Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 269:
::::Similarly, the vast majority of Anarchists reject capitalism (including anarcho-capitalism) because they feel that capitalism, whether endorsed by the state (as in the present-day USA) or simply left unopposed (as it would be in "anarcho"-capitalism), would degenerate into a mafia-like organization thriving wholly by its engagement in economic tyranny and financial terrorism. Wait, no, sorry, "would degenerate into" should read: "has since its inception been". --[[User:Corvun|Corvun]] 07:50, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Should mentions of "Atheist-Catholicism" be in the [[Catholicism]] article? I think not. In the ten years I have been actively researching anarchism and anarchists, I've personally met perhaps a hundred anarcho-syndicalists, anarcho-communists, -feminists, -pacifists, -environmentalists, -primitivists, -individualists, -buddhists, -taoists, -christians, -discordians, freethinkers, anarcho-straightedge-vegans, anarchists-without-adjectives, and green-anarchists, but '''never''' any "national-anarchists" or "anarcho-capitalists". I've met plenty of libertarians, socialists, communists, trotskyists, marxists, leninists, maoists, fascists, realists, classical liberals, neoliberals, new-federalists, right-wing christians and maybe ''one'' stalinist, but '''never any of these internet-only, self-described "movements"'''. I've talked to people in the ISO, SWP, RCP, CP-USA, Libertarian Party, Green Party, Students Against Sweatshops movement, Free Linden LaRouche! "movement", Democratic and Republican parties, ''and they all seem to understand that anarchists are against capitalism and the state,'' that is, if they'd even heard of anarchism in the first place. Why is this discussion even necessary? (sorry for the rant) --[[User:Albamuth|albamuth]] 08:55, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
== Anarcho-capitalism is not the same thing as free-market anarchism ==
| |||