Alter: template type, title. Add: issue, volume, chapter-url, chapter, s2cid, isbn, pages, author pars. 1-1. Removed or converted URL. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were actually parameter name changes. Upgrade ISBN10 to ISBN13. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Ost316 | Category:Articles for deletion | via #UCB_Category 69/766
[[Usability testing]] methods aim to evaluate the ease of use of a software product by its users. As existing methods are subjective and open to interpretation, scholars have been studying the efficacy of each method
<ref>Genise, Pauline (August 28, 2002.). "Usability Evaluation: Methods and Techniques". University of Texas</ref>
<ref>{{Cite journal|lastlast1=Dhouib|firstfirst1=A.|last2=Trabelsi|first2=Abdelwaheb|last3=Kolski|first3=C.|last4=Neji|first4=M.|date=2016|title=A classification and comparison of usability evaluation methods for interactive adaptive systems|url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7529639|journal=2016 9th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI)|pages=246–251|doi=10.1109/HSI.2016.7529639|isbn=978-1-5090-1729-4|s2cid=19110009}}</ref>
<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hocko|first=Jennifer M.|date=2002|title=Reliability of Usability Evaluation Methods|url=http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/citations;jsessionid=C5845D40ECD67930411AE8996F45674D?doi=10.1.1.131.243}}</ref>
and their adequacy to different subjects, comparing which one may be the most appropriate in fields like e-learning,
<ref>{{Cite journalbook|lastlast1=Vukovac|firstfirst1=Dijana Plantak|last2=Kirinic|first2=V.|last3=Klicek|first3=B.|date=2010|title=A Comparison of Usability Evaluation Methods for e- Learning Systems|chapter=A Comparison of Usability Evaluation Methods for e-Learning Systems|chapter-url=https://www.daaam.info/Downloads/Pdfs/science_books_pdfs/2010/Sc_Book_2010-027.pdf|doi=10.2507/daaam.scibook.2010.27|isbn=9783901509742}}</ref>
e-commerce,
<ref>{{Cite journal|lastlast1=Hasan|firstfirst1=L.|last2=Morris|first2=Anne|last3=Probets|first3=S.|date=2012|title=A comparison of usability evaluation methods for evaluating e-commerce websites|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2011.596996|journal=Behav. Inf. Technol.|volume=31|issue=7|pages=707–737|doi=10.1080/0144929X.2011.596996|s2cid=9998763}}</ref>
mobile applications,
<ref>{{Cite journalbook|lastlast1=Mathur|firstfirst1=P.|last2=Chande|first2=Swati V.|title=Microservices in Big Data Analytics|date=2020|titlechapter=Empirical Investigation of Usability Evaluation Methods for Mobile Applications Using Evidence-Based Approach|pages=95–110|chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-981-15-0128-9_9|doi=10.1007/978-981-15-0128-9_9|isbn=978-981-15-0127-2}}</ref>
or insurance websites.<ref>{{Cite journal|lastlast1=Chen|firstfirst1=Weichao|last2=Paul|first2=Anindita|last3=Kibaru|first3=Francis|last4=Ma|first4=Yanfei|last5=Saparova|first5=Dinara|date=2015-01-01|title=Two-Phase Usability Evaluation of Insurance Website Prototypes|url=https://doi.org/10.4018/ijebr.2015010101|journal=International Journal of E-Business Research|volume=11|issue=1|pages=1–22|doi=10.4018/ijebr.2015010101|issn=1548-1131}}</ref>
