Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zig (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:31, 19 February 2021

Revision as of 13:46, 22 February 2021

Line 9:

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford|talk]]) 15:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)</small>

*'''Delete''', Several [[WP:SPS]] and lack of [[WP:SIGCOV]].--[[User:Kieran207|<span style="color: green">Kieran207</span>]]([[User talk:Kieran207|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]]-[[Special:Contributions/Kieran207|<span style="color: darkgreen">Contribs</span>]]) 20:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

** {{u|Kieran207}}, please ignore the crappy sources when assessing notability. Did you not find any [[WP:RELIABLE]] sources with [[WP:SIGCOV]]? ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 13:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

*'''Keep''', True, the project is recent and has not received a lot of coverage due to its volatility. Yet https://lwn.net/Articles/833400/ on [[LWN.net]] has not been written by the developer group and is quite recent. Not sure if this counts as significant, though it's certainly not low effort. --[[User:LuckyStarr]] 09:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' Zig is an open-source project (We relax our criteria for these projects). When looking at [https://github.com/ziglang/zig GitHub] it looks like a serious work (over 12K commits, 8K stars, and 300 contributors). After deep search (I checked all of the links provided by Google search engine after search using "Zig programming") I could get the next resources