Revision as of 01:53, 7 June 2003 edit TakuyaMurata (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers 92,676 edits ok then ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:55, 7 June 2003 edit undo Fubar Obfusco (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 7,226 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 30: According to the convension about naming programming language, we don't put pre-diambiguation programming language. It is debatable but is an agreement that seems reached. I am not sure which one LISP or Lisp. To me LISP sounds rather antiquated but I am not sure. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata\|Taku]] 01:19 7 Jun 2003 (UTC) :To me, spelling it "LISP" reeks of either a botched transliteration from small-caps (as with "UNIX", see the jargon file) or a usage on all-caps terminals or filesystems. Bleah. I recognize the "''Foo'' programming language" (rather than "''Foo'' (programming language)") convention for languages whose names have another meaning (like Python, C, and Lisp, and unlike Fortran) --[[User:Fubar Obfusco\|FOo]] 03:55 7 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Talk:Lisp (programming language): Difference between revisions