Structure, sequence and organization: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:47, 19 April 2020

Revision as of 01:59, 2 March 2021

Line 93:

;Sources

{{refbegin}}

*{{cite web |ref=harv |url=http://www.bu.edu/law//central/jd/organizations/journals/scitech/volume81/abramson.pdf

|title=Promoting Innovation in the Software Industry: A First Principles Approach to Intellectual Property Reform

|first=Bruce |last=Abramson

|year=2001

|publisher=Boston University

|accessdateaccess-date=2012-05-31}}

*{{cite web |ref=harv |url=http://www.groklaw.net/pdf3/OraGoogle-1202.pdf

|title=ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON DECOMPILED FILES

|publisher=U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

|first=William |last=Alsup

|date=May 11, 2012 |accessdateaccess-date=2012-06-02}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pUfFpzC3ks4C&pg=PA115

|title=Intellectual Property for the Internet

|first=J. Scott |last=Davidson

|publisher=Aspen Publishers Online |year=1997

|isbn=0471167037}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Wne6MqjEk-AC&pg=SA11-PA17

|title=Epstein on Intellectual Property

|first=Michael A. |last=Epstein

|publisher=Aspen Publishers Online |year=2006 |isbn=073555983X}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QACY2JCu4BUC&pg=PA87

|title=Software and Intellectual Property Protection: Copyright and Patent Issues for Computer and Legal Professionals

|first=Bernard A. |last=Galler

|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |year=1995 |isbn=0899309747}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c6IS3RnN6qAC&pg=PA89

|title=Legal Battles That Shaped the Computer Industry

|first=Lawrence D. |last=Graham

|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |year=1999

|isbn=1567201784}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9NKTDmiXb14C&pg=PA407

|title=Economics, Law, and Intellectual Property: Seeking Strategies for Research and Teaching in a Developing Field

|first=Ove |last=Granstrand

|publisher=Springer |year=2003 |isbn=1402077084}}

*{{cite journal |ref=harv |url=http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/v10/10HarvJLTech239.pdf

|journal=Harvard Journal of Law & Technology

|volume=10 |issue=2 |date=Winter 1997

|title=COMPUTER SCIENCE CONCEPTS IN COPYRIGHT CASES: THE PATH TO A COHERENT LAW

|first1=Marci A. |last1=Hamilton |first2=Ted |last2=Sabety

|accessdateaccess-date=2012-05-30}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wepc2ljYrJEC&pg=PA170

|title=U.S. Intellectual Property Law And Policy

|first=Hugh C. |last=Hansen

|publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |year=2006 |isbn=1845428668}}

*{{cite journal |ref=harv |url=http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2911&context=flr

|journal=Fordham Law Review

|volume=59 |issue=4 |date=January 1, 1991

|title=Copyright Protection of SSO: Replete with Internal Deficiencies and Practical Dangers

|first=Cary S. |last=Kappel

|accessdateaccess-date=2012-05-30}}

*{{cite journal |ref=harv |url=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57428612-94/oracle-v-google-jury-returns-partial-verdict-favoring-oracle/

|journal=CNET

|title=Oracle v. Google jury returns partial verdict, favoring Oracle

|first1=Rachel |last1=King |first2=Dan |last2=Farber

|date=May 7, 2012 |accessdateaccess-date=2012-05-30}}

*{{cite web |ref=harv |url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/05/oracle-google-judge-asks-for-comment-on-eu-court-ruling/

|work=Ars Technica

|title=Oracle v. Google judge asks for comment on EU court ruling

|first=Timothy B. |last=Lee

|date=May 3, 2012 |accessdateaccess-date=2012-05-30}}

*{{cite web |ref=harv |url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/05/google-wins-crucial-api-ruling-oracles-case-decimated/

|work=ars technica

|title=Google wins crucial API ruling, Oracle's case decimated

|first=Joe |last=Mullin

|date=May 31, 2012 |accessdateaccess-date=2012-05-31}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y6uJ7u4331cC&pg=PA270

|title=Major Principles of Media Law

|first1=Wayne |last1=Overbeck |first2=Genelle |last2=Belmas

|publisher=Cengage Learning |year=2011 |isbn=978-0495901952}}

*{{cite web |url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/litigationresourcecenter/blogs/litigationblog/archive/2012/05/07/jury-says-google-infringed-but-it-can-t-agree-on-fair-use.aspx

*{{cite web |ref=harv

|url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/litigationresourcecenter/blogs/litigationblog/archive/2012/05/07/jury-says-google-infringed-but-it-can-t-agree-on-fair-use.aspx

|work=LexisNexis

|date=May 7, 2012

|title=Jury Says Google Infringed, But It Can't Agree On Fair Use

|first=Melissa |last=Ritti

|accessdateaccess-date=2012-05-31}}

*{{cite journal |ref=harv |url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/65532/Reverse_Engineering

|journal=Computerworld

|title=Reverse-Engineering

|first=Mathew |last=Schwartz

|date=November 12, 2001 |accessdateaccess-date=2012-05-31}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mko89ZDIVx0C&pg=SA5-PA55

|title=Scott on Outsourcing: Law And Practice

|first=Michael D. |last=Scott

|publisher=Aspen Publishers Online |year=2006 |isbn=0735561788}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NMHEZ_TBBXgC&pg=SA9-PA6

|title=E-Copyright Law Handbook

|first=Laura Lee |last=Stapleton

|publisher=Aspen Publishers Online |year=2002 |isbn=0735529442}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ecPJSiHIi2kC&pg=PA11

|title=Developments In The Economics Of Copyright: Research And Analysis

|first1=Lisa |last1=Takeyama |first2=Wendy J. |last2=Gordon |first3=Ruth |last3=Towse

|publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |year=2005 |isbn=1843769301}}

*{{cite book |ref=harv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fe9af6rf3lkC&pg=PA52

|title=Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPs Agreement

|first=Abdulqawi |last=Yusuf