Revision as of 14:18, 15 January 2007 edit Metalpasman (talk \| contribs) 46 edits SynthMaker ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:49, 17 January 2007 edit undo CiaranG (talk \| contribs) 2,356 edits →SynthMaker: reply Next edit →
Line 43: Although this is a commercial product and it's specialized in VST plug-in development this is a very good example of visual programming language and environment in a modern approach. Is this a candidate to the list? [[User:Metalpasman\|Metalpasman]] 14:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC) :There's nothing wrong with it being commercial. It certainly looks relevant to me - they link to two [[WP:RS\|sources]] from their home page which would appear to satisfy [[WP:SOFTWARE]], so worthy of its own article. Personally I think the article should be created before adding it to this page. [[User:CiaranG\|CiaranG]] 12:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Visual programming language: Difference between revisions